It’s an interesting idea. One downside of a “free” app that does nothing without other elements of a Roomie ecosystem such as requiring Roomie Agent or full Roomie on the network is that everybody and their extended family, quite literally in this case, will end up downloading it, not reading instructions, thinking it doesn’t work as the standalone remote they thought it would be from a screenshot or an icon, and 1-starring the app still never having realized anything about what “Roomie Remote Guest” was intended to do. The notion that downloaders of free apps actually read the product description is sadly comical. For $10, most people read the description. At $0, few do.
It’s the reason we charge $10 for Roomie’s base app rather than just make it free with 1 IP device and then make the Home Theater Pack $30 instead of $20 (which has always been what I would have preferred). If there’s no bouncer at the door, the amount of people that download and have no idea which way is up is really crazy.
Obvious examples (of many thousands) include the Facebook and WSJ apps. Those are both objectively great apps. Yet, due to some bug that afflicted perhaps 0.001% of their users, that’s more than enough with a free app to get hundreds of 1-stars in a very short period, which repeats with basically every version they ever release. Similarly, a free version of Roomie that was heavily restricted in some way like that would be like flypaper for the non-reading crowd.
This doesn’t mean we wont do it. I could suddenly decide this is what we want to do next week. I’m attracted by the fact that it would be quite straightforward to create such a product and it would generally be a fun idea and a great way to introduce friends and relatives to the pure awesome that is Roomie.
But the App Store is a wild and crazy place with some ugly aspects and a lot of factors we’d otherwise want to ignore.
We’ll consider it. Thanks,
Will